Ishwa helper Reged: 03/03/02 Posts: 553

Re: Hindutva [Re: Sharmini] #18336 - 07/04/02 06:59 AM Edit Reply Quote

The word secular means worldly. This word comes from the non-religious corner: the marxism/communist/socialist movement, which is very much anti-religion. This word was adopted by the Nehru dynasty, because of their special attachment to marxistic idealogy modelled on the former Soviet industrial experience. Now everybody knows that Asian countries were not the industrial societies with the proletarian groups, who were supposed to rise against the bourgeoisie and destroy the (aristocratic and bourgeois) classes. All the terminology and phenomenon is based on a European industrial society, with two opposing systems: kapitalist versus communist! [Maoistic communism is based on the rural society, but is totalitarian too, with all the destructive effects on society] All the communist systems are a phenomenon of their European times on the same level even with fascism and Islam-in-history that it is totalitarian (for SOV: totalitarian means almost total control of the way of living of the subjects done by the elite). Communism is against religion and classes for the simple reason that those deeprooted factions have to be destroyed to attain power themselves. The effect is new classes: the same system, but with new names, but dangerously with this slight but grave difference: total control what to wear, what to consume, what to say, what to believe, etc. and severe punishment for not obeying, with a excelling intelligence service and administration (the source of bureaucracy) to check. And of course whenever possible the destruction of (material) symbolisms of previous systems. This communist lobby system installed by the Nehru dynasty is still working in many (educational) institutions, press, etc. even when housing non-communists. Some Indian people are really copycats, enforced by the immense bureacratic hurdles created from 1947. The foreign models of thinking were indoctrinated in the Asian countries with state controlled means. The vicious effect was that also the indigenous systems were marked and modelled with marxist terminoloy and idealogy, even though the systems were totally different. (discrediting non-marxist systems was done without scrupules) The only problem for the Nehru dynasty was, that the country is democratic, so to stay in power the divide-and-rule must be done in the newly created fragmentation of Indian society, with preference a dissociation of Hindus from of their group. (Very smart move) Some real great virtues are also the very weak points of Hindus: their sense of sticking to 'Day�' (empathy towards others), not-first-strike 'Hims� (reactionary behaviour), "Ksham�' (mercy) and 'Saty�graha' (sticking to being truthful/sincere), even if that implies their own disadvantage in public opinion and an invitation for repetitions. Unnecessary to mention that these virtues became weak spots because of being optimally profited of by pseudo-Hindus (giving the impression that they are Hindus, with even Hindu sounding names) and others against Hindus many times, still.