Ishwa helper Reged: 03/03/02 Posts: 553

Re: misskhalistan [Re: Sanjay_R_Kumar] #17874 - 06/24/02 04:42 AM Edit Reply Quote

Hmm, Sanjay, you should do more research on that period. The reason for instance why the children of Govind Singh were killed, was that they didn't want to embrace Islam. So also the other killings. The fight from the advent of Islamized Arabs, Turks and Afghans was every time about robbery and religion as two sides of one coin. The history books of today are still with some dubious insights from the leftwing historians. But the huge evidence counterattacks these. Sikhism is historically a Sant Bhakti-movement within Hinduism. It was not different from other movements before which were anti-ritualistic: Shakas, Kushanas, Hunas, etc were also taken in the mainstream, so also the approach of N�naka towards Indian Muslims and foreigners. It has become a fashion to fragmentize anything Indian from the British times. It was of course needed for their cause. But how actively it will be denied, the Hinduness in the Indian-started movements is too great to ignore. It'll take time to refresh the memories. Till then the Indianness must be emphasized!