Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Ishwa
helper
***

Reged: 03/03/02
Posts: 553

Re: Gita: The eternal song of Love and Ultimate Wisdom [Re: Ishwa]
#19117 - 08/08/02 03:45 AM

How and why did the four Madhahib - the Hanafi, Shafi'i, Maliki and Hanbali - emerge and evolve? Why do Muslims follow one school in one country and another school in another country? Why this lack of uniformity?
by Dr. Muzammil H. Siddiqi (edited by me)

Muslims followed the Qur'an and the explanations of the Prophet. Whenever they needed any explanation they went to the Prophet and he either waited for the divine revelation in order to answer them, or gave them his own answers according to the authority that Allah gave him.

After the Prophet's departure from this earth, his Rightly Guided Caliphs (al-Khulafa' al-Rashidun) were the leaders of the Ummah (nation). Unlike the Prophet, they were not the recipients of Divine revelation, but they had the full authority to interpret the Shari'ah in their time. Their knowledge, piety and religious authority made the people to go back to them for any final decision. The Caliphs used to consult many Sahabah, but then whatever decision they would make, theirs was the final word. In other words, we can say that there was only one Madh'hab during the time of al-Khulafa' al-Rashidun. They kept the unity and uniformity of the Ummah. We know that when Muslims differed on the readings of the Qur'an, the Caliph Uthman sent his authorized copy to all provinces and removed all other copies of the Qur'an from circulation and burned them. Thus he was able to keep the unity of the Ummah.

However, with the emergence of the Umayyad rule, the situation changed. The Umayyad caliphs did not have the same religious authority as the previous Khulafa'. Some of them deviated from the true path of Islam. Many Jurists and scholars used to avoid them and they began their teachings independently in their own locations. The great Sahabah and their followers (tabi'un) went to different areas and taught and preached to their local people. There was no central authority that could unite all the opinions at that time. The Islamic State was expanding. This set a trend for the development of various schools of interpretations under various able scholars and jurists.

The Hadith was also not fully collected. So there were two main trends among the early jurists: those who relied on Hadith only, while there were others who frequently used Qiyas and Ra'y. This situation continues throughout the Umayyad period.

After the Umayyad (661-750 CE) came the Abbasids. They were also not the ideal caliphs like al- Khulafa' al-Rashidun, but in comparison to the Umayyads, they were more supportive of Islamic law and its scholars. During their time various scholars were encouraged to write books on Islamic laws. They also patronized the collection of early Fatwas. The Caliphs encouraged religious discussions and debates. Various scholars had the opportunity to debate their positions with others. Due to more discussions and debates, some people changed their opinions. Some schools were eliminated and others merged into major schools. Thus four major schools of Fiqh came about. The crystallization of four major Madhahib of Islamic Fiqh came about by the 3rd century of Hijrah or the 9th century of the common era, before this there were about twenty different Madhahib.

Once the Madhahib became established in different areas, the local teacher used them to teach the Shari'ah to their students. The local courts applied the decisions and Fatwas of their local jurists.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Followers

Blog Archive