Ishwa helper Reged: 03/03/02 Posts: 553

Re: Hindu Muslim Marriage [Re: sickofviolence] #22132 - 10/12/02 03:55 PM Edit Reply Quote

One has to stay in Satsang, amongst good-minded people. That means automatically that many Muslims are excluded, because they're really Badbakht to many Hindus and other non-Muslims. Those Hindus who sound very angry, have almost all (felt) a connection with the agression of those Muslims. That's a Satya or Haqeeqat for them, and a reason why their Satsang consists mainly of non-Muslims. Manavas have sometimes bad people amongst many good ones, Rakshasas have many some good ones amongst many bad. According to the presentation of many Muslims, they would certainly have been classified as Mlecchas or any other name by the ancients (as was really done, from the moment Islam appeared in Indian texts). These scriptures come from many layers of the Indian people. Many brutally or forcefully conversed ex-Hindus mourn that day. The somehow stil kept secretively or disguised many Hindu customs. Why they didn't change their religion again? Because its one of the most grave sins to change religion for Muslims. And that is substabtiated with real (death) threads, as any Muslim trying to leave that faith knows. The Bhavishya Purana calls their prophet even a Paishachi demon, as also his followers, who tried to impose their vision to other nations. In this text, the BhavishyaPurana it is thus said: "His name is given as: Maha-mada. He lived during one king named as Bhojaraja and one Kalidasa, a Brahmin. Mahamada is named as a Paishachi (demon) and called a magician. Their fresh holy city is Madahiina. This Mahamada was reduced to asses and became the 'God' of the Barbarians. One Paishachi, who was an incarnation of that 'God', said to Bhojaraja that the Arya Dharma is the highest Dharma for the kings, but on command of Isha, the Lord, he must introduce/convert to the strict religion of the Paishachis. After this, the 'God' disappeared and Bhojaraja introduced a new fashion: Sanskrit (called: VaaNii Samskrtii) was only for the 3 highest castes, and Prakrit (called Praakrtii Bhaasaa) only for Shudras." All the references to Mahamada's section in the BhavishyaPurana are in: III.3.3.1-32. The name Mahamada is also mentioned in III.4.22.57. [One interesting feature of the Bhavishya is also that AFTER the Islam entered, the Shudras became isolated from the other3 ones] Vinaire, also raises a sound question.